Easton v. O'Reilly
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco. The facts sufficiently appear in the head notes and opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMyrick, J.
This is an action of ejectment. The plaintiffs had judgment as to defendants Burr, Wortham, and H. Jones, who have appealed.
The suit was commenced January 20, 1874, against Burr and one O’Reilly, who were served and answered. March 8, 1875, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, naming as defendants O’Reilly, Wortham, Burr, Silva, and John Doe Jones. A second amended complaint (on which, and answers thereto, the action was tried) was filed August 29, 1878, naming as defendants O’Reilly, one Haubricht, Burr, Wortham, Silva, Henry Jones, John Doe, Peter Roe, and Richard Roe, the last three *307b…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barber v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Manly v. HowlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880
- Klink v. CohenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Wright v. RoseberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
3Cited by7 opinions
- Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Collins v. GrayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
- Edwards v. RolleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- White v. SotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Vanderslice v. MatthewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.