Legal Opinion

Holman v. Gill

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1883PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Macon county; the Hon. C. B. Smith, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mulkey

John Gill, on the 19th of March, 1865, died intestate, leaving a widow and eight children. At the time of his death he was the owner in fee of lots 8 and 9, in block 2, of Plant & Tuttle’s addition, and lots 5 and 6, in block 8, of Smith & Co.’s addition, to the city of Decatur, this State, being the same property now in controversy. The lots in question constituted the homestead of the deceased, and continued to be occupied by the widow as such after his death, without any allotment of her dower. In August, 1866, Martin Holman, the appellant, recovered in the Macon circuit court a judgment…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Stow v. SteelIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Kinney v. KnoebelIllinois Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Malmloff v. KerrIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Herr v. BroadwellColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Herr v. BroadwellColorado Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Malmloff v. KerrIllinois Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Pfaff v. Chrysler Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API