Legal Opinion
United States v. Mango
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided March 5, 1998No. 9:96-cv-00327PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
MUNSON, Senior District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
Presently before the court are four motions which defendants have filed. Each of these motions seeks to dismiss certain counts of the Indictment. The first motion seeks to dismiss Counts 2-31 for unlawful delegation of permitting authority. The second seeks to dismiss Counts 14-19. The third seeks to dismiss Counts 2-13 and 26-31 for lack of authority to enforce criminally the provisions of Appendices C and D to the Final Environmental Impact Statement (“FEIS”). Finally, the fourth motion seeks to dismiss Counts 2-13 and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- West Virginia University Hospitals, Inc. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. GiordanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Louise Mango, Kenneth Austin, Kevin Dominske and Phenix Environmental, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- Johnson v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
- Iroquois Gas Transmission System, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998