Carter v. United States
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, Associate Judge:
Appellant appeals from the denial of a motion to dismiss on the grounds of double jeopardy. 1 During trial, the prosecutor and codefendant moved for a mistrial which was granted. Appellant contends that his retrial, scheduled for July 15, 1985, is barred because the trial judge failed to make a sufficient inquiry to determine if a mistrial was a manifest necessity or to consider alternatives. He also contends the trial judge’s failure to voir dire the jury prior to declaring a mistrial violated appellant’s right to procedural due process. We affirm. 2
I
Appellant and a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
- Purcell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
- Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.