Legal Opinion

Carter v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 19, 1985No. 85-266PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGERS, Associate Judge:

Appellant appeals from the denial of a motion to dismiss on the grounds of double jeopardy. 1 During trial, the prosecutor and codefendant moved for a mistrial which was granted. Appellant contends that his retrial, scheduled for July 15, 1985, is barred because the trial judge failed to make a sufficient inquiry to determine if a mistrial was a manifest necessity or to consider alternatives. He also contends the trial judge’s failure to voir dire the jury prior to declaring a mistrial violated appellant’s right to procedural due process. We affirm. 2

I

Appellant and a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. JornSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Oregon v. KennedySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Irick v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Catlett v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Hardy v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Purcell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Powell v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API