Legal Opinion

Ulmer v. Ulrey

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 14, 1939PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Bees

Reversing.

Transylvania Subdivision is a suburb of the city of Louisville, fronting about one-fourth mile on the Ohio River. All deeds to purchasers of lots in the subdivision contained this restrictive covenant: “All lots in Transylvania shall be used for residential purposes only, but this shall not exclude their use for agriculture.” '

Albert Ulmer and others, owners of fourteen lots in the subdivision, brought this action against Walter 0. Ulrey and wife, Lillian B. Ulrey, owners of lot No. 17 in the subdivision, to enjoin them from using their premises for…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Moore v. StevensSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
  2. McMurtry v. Phillips Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  3. Anderson v. HensleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  4. Biltmore Development Company v. KohnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  5. Greer v. BornsteinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Otting v. GradskyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
  2. Gregory v. CrainCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  3. Gagliardi v. Shender, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1962

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API