State Ex Rel. Farrell v. Stovall
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkie, J.
On this remand, two issues are raised by this petition for habeas corpus and declaratory judgment action.
1. Do the equal protection requirements of the state and federal constitutions invalidate the sex deviate commitment proceedings under ch. 975, Stats., insofar as they fail to provide a jury trial, if requested, at either the initial commitment or subsequent commitment proceedings?
2. Are any of the distinctions between mentally ill persons under ch. 51 and sex deviates under ch. 975, Stats., constitutionally permissible?
1. The right to a jury trial.
It is petitioner’s essential contention…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Williams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Baxstrom v. HeroldSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Huebner v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- Hardy v. MatthewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lathrop v. DonohueWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. PostWisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
- Lessard v. SchmidtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1976
- State Ex Rel. Watts v. Combined Community Services Board of Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- State Ex Rel. Kovach v. SchubertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.