Legal Opinion
Martin v. Lociccero
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided June 16, 1995No. 93-CV-419HPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
HECKMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties have consented to have the undersigned conduct all further proceedings in this ease, including trial and entry of judgment, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Defendants City of Buffalo (the “City”) and Bison Baseball, Inc. and Stadium Services, Inc. (“BB I/SSI”) have moved for summary judgment (Items 17 and 34). Plaintiff has moved to amend the complaint to add third-party defendant Chase Investigations, Inc. *180(“Chase”) as a direct defendant (Item 31). For the reasons that follow, the defendants’ summary judgment motions are…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Northbrook National Insurance v. J & R Vending Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Condon v. Town of BrookfieldDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2024
- Whitaker v. CRCC Mail RoomDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019