Legal Opinion

Emmons v. LeMaster, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided August 11, 2000No. 84,164PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Green J.:

Cheryl M. Emmons and LeMaster, Inc., through its president, Charles A. LeMaster, entered into a written agreement giving LeMaster an exclusive option to purchase Emmons’ airplane if she defaulted on repayment of a loan from LeMaster. The trial court originally found that this transaction was not a secured transaction governed by K.S.A. 84-9-201 el seq. The Court of Appeals disagreed, determining that the agreement between the. parties was a security agreement and satisfied the requirement of *941a writing. The Court of Appeals remanded for a new trial on the issue of whether the parties…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miran Investment Co. v. Medical West Building Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  2. Owens v. Automobile Recovery Bureau, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Rainey v. Ford Motor Credit CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Fletcher v. CobuzziDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Chen v. Profit Sharing Plan of BohneCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. National Operating, L.P. v. Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  2. In Re Cbgb Holdings, LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2010
  3. Chamorro Equities, Inc. v. McCurdySuperior Court of Guam · 2014
  4. FRED BURDETT v. RICK OPTONDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  5. National Operating, L.P. v. Mutual Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API