Legal Opinion
Kreisher v. Spiegel
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 28, 1923No. 157PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMayer, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). We have set forth the three papers supra, so as that the questions involved may be fully understood. We pass by the contention that' the agreement of Spiegel was with Finkelstein, and not with Columbia Shoe Company. We assume that it was with the latter. Spiegel, in his affidavit, did not state that the money he collected from Ajax and Smith was for shoes made out of the leather furnished under the agreement of March *46725th; but we lay aside this and certain other questions raised in order to reach the fundamental points presented.
It being admitted that, at the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Lazarus, Michel & Lazarus v. PrenticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- In re Midtown Contracting Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
- In re Joseph R. Marquette, Jr., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1918
- In re Hub Carpet Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Taubel-Scott-Kitzmiller Co. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- May v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Thico Plan, Inc. v. Maplewood Poultry Co. (In Re Maplewood Poultry Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · 1980
- In Re Times Square Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1931
- In Re Retail Stores Delivery CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1933
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.