Watson v. State Ex Rel. Michael
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Justice.
The case on appeal before us involves a contempt order issued by the appellee (the court) against the appellant (Mr. Watson) during the course of a trial involving issues of oil and gas drainage. Prior to the trial a motion in limine was argued and the court ruled that no evidence was to be presented by any party regarding the amount of royalties that had been received by the plaintiff below from any interest he might have in wells offsetting the allegedly drained well. At trial the plaintiff testified on direct examination that he had been told if the oil and gas field in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Fulreader v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Smith v. State Ex Rel. RaburnCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1975
- Brierley v. Anaconda CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1974
- Best v. EvansSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sommer v. SommerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Henry v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- LAY v. ELLISSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2018
- Hogg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
- Hogg v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.