Jordan v. Talbot
California Supreme Court
1Dissent
SCHAUER, J.,
Dissenting. — It appears to me that upon a review of the entire record the evidence on the points at issue here should be held to be, as a matter of law, insufficient to support a judgment for the plaintiff and that affirmance of the order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial should be placed upon that ground.
Plaintiff in her opening brief states that “Briefly, the facts are, that the Appellant [plaintiff] was a tenant in the apartment house of Respondent [defendant]. Respondent served a three day notice on Appellant. Then, one day during the absence of the Appellant,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- California Products, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Clark v. Service Auto Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1926
- Baxley v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Winchester v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.