Legal Opinion · Dissent

Jordan v. Talbot

California Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1961No. S. F. 20578Published

1Dissent

SCHAUER, J.,

Dissenting. — It appears to me that upon a review of the entire record the evidence on the points at issue here should be held to be, as a matter of law, insufficient to support a judgment for the plaintiff and that affirmance of the order granting defendant’s motion for a new trial should be placed upon that ground.

Plaintiff in her opening brief states that “Briefly, the facts are, that the Appellant [plaintiff] was a tenant in the apartment house of Respondent [defendant]. Respondent served a three day notice on Appellant. Then, one day during the absence of the Appellant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Francis v. West Virginia Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
  2. California Products, Inc. v. MitchellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  3. Clark v. Service Auto Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Baxley v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Winchester v. BeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1906

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API