Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Forino v. Garfinkel
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 22, 1947No. 136PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McVICAR, District Judge.
This action is before the Court on the petition of Lenzi Forino for a writ of habeas corpus, wherein he alleges that he is being unlawfully deprived of his liberty by the District Director of Immigration and Naturalization and the United States Attorney for this District.
The Relator is a native and a citizen of Italy now thirty-nine years of age. He was admitted to the United States for german*847ent residence September 17, 1928, at New York and has resided in this country continuously since that time. On December 5, 1932, and within 5 years after his entry, he pleaded…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Ex Parte GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Cummings v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
- Lindsey v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kring v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States ex rel. Forino v. GarfinkelCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
- Resseguie v. Lewisburg Borough, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Union County1962