Legal Opinion

Skaggs v. Johnson

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 12, 1996No. 95-982PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bradley D. Jesson, Chief Justice.

This is a medical malpractice case. Appellants Mary and James Skaggs appeal from a trial court’s order granting summary judgment in favor of appellees, Drs. Philip Johnson and Richard Nix and the Little Rock Orthopedic & Sports Medical Clinic. On appeal, the Skaggses argue that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment and in ruling that expert testimony was necessary to meet their burden of proof. We affirm.

Mary Skaggs was in an automobile accident and suffered a compound fracture of her right leg on September 21, 1992. Approximately one inch of bone…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Cordes v. Outdoor Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Lanier v. TrammellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  4. Johns Hopkins Hospital v. GendaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  5. Reagan v. City of PiggottSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Neal v. Sparks Regional Medical CenterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
  2. Mitchell v. LincolnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
  3. Hamilton v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  4. Dodd v. Sparks Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2005
  5. Jones v. McGrawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API