Legal Opinion

Baker v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1904No. S.F. No. 2829PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.—

This action was brought to recover five hundred and thirty dollars as liquidated damages under section 629 of the Civil Code, for refusal and neglect of defendant to supply plaintiff with gas from January 9, 1900, to April 9, 1900. The defendant had judgment and plaintiff appeals.

The ease was tried upon an agreed statement of facts, which is made the findings in the case by stipulation between the parties. So far as necessary to this opinion, these facts are as follows: Plaintiff formerly resided at 124 Fulton Street, San Francisco, and there took gas of defendant after depositing…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Vallejo Electric Light Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Thompson v. San Francisco Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1912
  3. Smith v. LobbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  4. Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  5. Siry Investment v. FarkhondehpourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API