Hinckley v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
We have held that where a common carrier has received freight for transportation, under a special contract limiting his liability at common law, and by which he has undertaken, for an agreed compensation, to carry the goods to the termination of his route, and then to deliver to another carrier, his duty will end when the goods have reached that terminus and have been delivered to another carrier. (Babcock v. L.S. M.S.R.W. Co., 49 N.Y., 491.)
The written and printed receipt given to the plaintiff, in the case in hand, by the stationman at Oriskany — if it is the contract of the defendant —…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Long v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
- White v. . AshtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Babcock v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
3Cited by13 opinions
- Snow v. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Chicago & Southeastern Railway Co. v. Fifth National BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. FulghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
- Doolittle v. J. C. Murray & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907
- Gerard v. CowperthwaitNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1893
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.