Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Fulgham

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 15, 1890PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the City Court of Decatur. Tried before the Hon. W. H. Simpson.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, C. J.

This action was brought by the appellee ■against the appellant, and sought to recover a sum of money paid by plaintiff as an overcharge of freight for the transportation of coal from Warrior to Decatur. The complaint counted for money had and received, and on an account stated.

It is shown by the bill of exceptions, that the bill of lading recites, as the agreed rate of freight, the schedule rate of $1.40 per ton. That is the regular charge as found in the company’s published tariff of rates. On the arrival of the coal in Decatur, the plaintiff paid the amount oí freight due thereon at the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Long v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Hinckley v. . N.Y. Cen. H. River R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Pemberton Co. v. New York Central RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. American Sugar Refining Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1902
  2. Ex parte Louisville & Nashville R. R.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  3. Beggs v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  4. Curry v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1942
  5. State Ex Rel. Winterfield v. Hardin County Rural Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API