Putnam v. Morgan
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
HAND, District Judge.
I am not at all sure that I should have found the complainant's business fraudulent, if it had come before me for an independent decision. I certainly believe that, the article sent-to customers is a “new safety razor outfit,” and that, if they expect more, they have only to thank the delusion of their own cupidity, which a reasonable reflection would have shown them was without just basis. Perhaps it is a misstatement of the seller’s intention to say that she gives away a razor “free,” if ten cents is more than she ever means in fact to charge for the soap, when it is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
- Gottlieb v. SchafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
- Farley v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
- Hannegan v. Read Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
- Hannegan v. Read Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946