Legal Opinion

Putnam v. Morgan

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided August 12, 1909PublishedCited by 5 opinions

In Equity.

1Opinion of the Court

HAND, District Judge.

I am not at all sure that I should have found the complainant's business fraudulent, if it had come before me for an independent decision. I certainly believe that, the article sent-to customers is a “new safety razor outfit,” and that, if they expect more, they have only to thank the delusion of their own cupidity, which a reasonable reflection would have shown them was without just basis. Perhaps it is a misstatement of the seller’s intention to say that she gives away a razor “free,” if ten cents is more than she ever means in fact to charge for the soap, when it is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Public Clearing House v. CoyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. Bates & Guild Co. v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Farley v. HeiningerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  2. Gottlieb v. SchafferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
  3. Farley v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  4. Hannegan v. Read Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946
  5. Hannegan v. Read Magazine, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API