Legal Opinion

Keyser v. Margolis

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 27, 1966No. Appeal, 309PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice O’Brien,

Appellee-plaintiff brought this suit in equity, alleging that under an oral agreement made in 1957, he, Max Keyser, became a one-third partner with appellants in a wine-brokerage business known then as Margolis Associates, which subsequently became incorporated, and is now known as Margolis Associates, Inc. Appellee, in his complaint, prayed for an accounting from each and all of the appellants, and further prayed that a trusteeship as to one-third of the capital stock of the corporation be set up, and that stock be assigned to him.

Appellants contend that…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gianni v. Russell Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  2. United Refining Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Grubb v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
  4. Walker v. SaricksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Sokoloff v. StrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Hershey Foods Corporation v. Ralph Chapek, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Jacobson & Co. v. International Environment Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  4. Stainton v. TarantinoDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Hankin v. HankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API