Legal Opinion
STE. MARIE v. City of Dayton
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided October 7, 2002No. C-3-99-513PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ENTRY SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S RENEWED AND UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (DOC. #47, RENEWING DOC. #19); JUDGMENT TO ENTER IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANT AND AGAINST PLAINTIFF; TERMINATION ENTRY
RICE, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Thomas C. Ste. Marie (“Plaintiff’), pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, brought the underlying suit against Defendant City of Dayton (“City”), alleging that the City discharged him without due process. In a March 21, 2001, Decision and Entry (Doc. #27), the Court overruled cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff (Doc. # 18) and Defendant (Doc. # 19), finding…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Gutierrez v. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ste. Marie v. City of DaytonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004