Legal Opinion
United States v. Jingles
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 8, 2012No. 08-15634PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The court’s opinion filed June 8, 2012, is amended as follows: on slip opinion page 6521, line 16, replace “Like the petitioner in Cotton, Jingles did not preserve the issue in the district court, so like the claim in Cotton, Jingles’s claim is subject to plain error review.” with “Like the petitioner in Cotton, Jingles did not preserve the issue in the district court, so like the claim in Cotton, Jingles’s claim was subject to plain error review.”
OPINION
WALLACE, Senior Circuit Judge:
Defendant-Appellant Jingles appeals from the denial of his motion to set aside his convictions and…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Bousley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Stirone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Ball v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- United States v. Omar BanksCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Willie MickeyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- v. CarterColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- Dye v. Communications Ventures III, LP (In re Flashcom, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2013
- United States v. MaricopaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.