Legal Opinion · Dissent
Central Railroad v. Board of Public Utility Commissioners
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided January 26, 1934Published
1Dissent
I am unable to concur in the result reached by my associates.
The legislature, by chapter 319 of the laws of 1927 (Pamph.L. 1927, p. 712), established a state highway system, consisting of specified routes designated by number. These routes were not definitely located. It was provided that route No. 30 should extend from Trenton to Buttzville, "by way of Pennington, Ringoes, Flemington, Clinton, Washington and Buttzville," and route No. 31 from Princeton to Milford, New York, "by way of Somerville, Bedminster, Netcong, Newton, Lafayette, Hamburg, Vernon to a point in the vicinity of New…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Siler v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- New York & New England Railroad v. BristolSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Nebraska Ex Rel. OmahaSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF MINNESOTA Ex Rel. THE CITY OF DULUTHSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- State ex rel. City of Minneapolis v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.