Reed v. Christman

OPINION

LANSING, Judge.

Respondent Earl Reed brought suit against appellant Kenneth Christman for amounts due under an oral contract. The trial court awarded judgment for Reed in the amount of $2,759.72. Christman unsuccessfully moved for amended findings of fact and on appeal claims that the trial court’s failure to specify how the total award was arrived at is reversible error. We affirm.

FACTS

This is a case of quarreling contractors. Earl Reed is in the business of bidding on road construction projects for local townships. In the summer of 1984 he orally subcontracted with Kenneth Christman…