Legal Opinion

Haas v. Tough

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 6, 1903No. 13,177PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error from Jackson district court; Marshall Gephart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

This was an action of replevin. One Goggerty was indebted to the receiver of the State Bank of Circleville. An action was brought on the clairp, followed by a writ of attachment, under which plaintiff in error, who was sheriff, levied on ten horses claimed by defendants in error to have been purchased by them from Goggerty three days before they were seized on the attachment writ. The horses were de*254tained at Circleville by the sheriff for two or three days, when they were replevied from him in this action by defendants in error. They…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Palmer v. MeinersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1877
  2. Jameson v. KentNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Jones v. Balsley & RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  2. De Bolt v. Farmers' Exchange BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Hallwood Cash Register Co. v. DaileySupreme Court of Kansas · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API