Legal Opinion

Bauknight v. A. M. Sloan & Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1879PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Westcott

Complainants in the court below are A. M. Sloan & Co., judgment creditors, of Elias Bauknight and Johnson, Crews & Co., creditors, without a judgment, of the firm of E. Bauknight & Son, such firm consisting of Elias Bauknight and his son, William E. Bauknight. Such partnership has been dissolved by the death of William B. Bauknight, the Sheriff, Louis A. Barnes, being his administrator and legal representative.

Complainants assail E. Bauknight as a fraudulent grantor. With him, as defendants, they join his alleged fraudulent grantees, among whom William E. Bauknight is alleged to be. These…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. Montgomery Rail RoadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  2. Fillyau v. LavertySupreme Court of Florida · 1850
  3. Snodgrass v. AndrewsMississippi Supreme Court · 1855
  4. Mattair v. PayneSupreme Court of Florida · 1876
  5. North v. BradwaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1864

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brown v. SolarySupreme Court of Florida · 1896
  2. Murrell v. PetersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  3. Tucker v. FosterSupreme Court of Virginia · 1930
  4. Minor v. SumnerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. First National Bank v. KirkbySupreme Court of Florida · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API