Legal Opinion

North v. Bradway

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 15, 1864PublishedCited by 16 opinions

APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE RICE COUNTY. Points and authorities of Counsel for Appellants. I. The complaint in this action shows no connection between the various conveyances alleged — shows no conspiracy, privity or concert of action among the various transferees. II.

Read the full summary

APPEAL EROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE RICE COUNTY. Points and authorities of Counsel for Appellants. I. The complaint in this action shows no connection between the various conveyances alleged — shows no conspiracy, privity or concert of action among the various transferees. II. It does not appear from the complaint that the Defendants below, Randolph and Oole, had any knowledge of or part in the transaction by which H. M. Matteson conveyed lands to the Defendant below, Susannah Bradway, or that H. M. Matteson or Susannah Bradway had any knowledge of the conveyances from Thomas Bradway to…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court

McMillan, J.

This is an action brought by judgment creditors against their judgment debtor and his grantees to set aside certain conveyances alleged to be fraudulent, and to have certain property applied in satisfaction of their judgments.

The complaint alleges, substantially, that North & Carll and Russell were several creditors of the Defendant Thomas Bradway, on and prior to the 1st of August, 1862, at which time. Bradway was the owner of certain property, real and personal, described in the complaint; that North & Carll perfected their judgment against Bradway on the 29th of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Boyd & Suydam v. Hoyt & ParselNew York Court of Chancery · 1835

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Conley v. BuckSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Jones, Varnum & Co. v. Townsend's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Florida · 1885
  3. Johnson v. SampsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. DeWolf v. A. & W. Sprague Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1881
  5. Trego v. SkinnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API