Legal Opinion
San Diego Cnty. Health & Human Servs. Agency v. H.C. (In re H.C.)
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided December 4, 2017No. D072368PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAaron, J.
*1263H.C., a nonminor dependent of the juvenile court, appeals an order terminating her dependency case. ( Welf. & Inst. Code, § 391.)1 She contends that the court erred by determining that H.C.'s marriage rendered her ineligible for nonminor dependency jurisdiction. We agree with H.C. and therefore reverse.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
In 2013, the juvenile court declared H.C. a dependent under section 300. The court later selected long-term foster care as H.C.'s permanent plan. After H.C. turned 18, the court continued H.C.'s dependency case as a nonminor dependent in extended foster care.
Afte…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Robles v. Employment Development DepartmentCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- San Joaquin County Human Services Agency v. Jo. S.California Court of Appeal · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.