Legal Opinion
Ferguson v. Hartford Life & Accident Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 23, 2003No. 2:99-cv-06578PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAVAGE, District Judge.
Ronald E. Ferguson brought this action against the defendants Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company and ITT Hartford Insurance Group (collectively referred to as “Hartford”) pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. 29 U.S.C. § 1001, et seq. (“ERISA”). 1 He asserts that Hartford wrongfully denied his claim for long term disability benefits under his insurance policy. Hartford retorts that the plaintiff is not entitled to benefits because he is not disabled within the terms of the disability policy and is still able to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Tommaso Fargnoli v. Larry G. Massanari, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Maria H. Pinto v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Jack R. Salley, Individually and on Behalf of His Minor Daughter, Danielle Salley, Cross-Appellants. v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Gideon Goldstein v. Johnson Johnson & JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lesser v. Reliance Standard Life Ins. Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2019
- Pettaway v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010