Legal Opinion
Thanh Nguy v. Jabil Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 7, 2026No. 5:24-cv-06798Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 THANH NGUY, Case No. 24-cv-06798-EKL (VKD) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S 10 v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS; ORDER FOR SUPPLEMENTAL SUBMISSIONS 11 JABIL INC., Re: Dkt. No. 60 Defendant. 12 13 14 Defendant Jabil, Inc. (“Jabil”) moves for monetary sanctions of $ 28,536.35 in attorneys’ 15 fees and costs Jabil says it incurred due to plaintiff Thanh Nguy’s last-minute cancellation of 16 Jabil’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition.1 Dkt. No. 61. Mr. Nguy opposes the motion. Dkt. No.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Camacho v. Bridgeport Financial, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Business Guides, Inc. v. Chromatic Communications Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Julie Chalmers v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Darnella BARJON and Lee Duran, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. John H. DALTON, Secretary of the Navy, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.