Legal Opinion
United States v. Graham
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 1, 2012No. Criminal No. RDB-11-0094PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Memorandum Opinion
RICHARD D. BENNETT, District Judge.
Defendants Aaron Graham and Eric Jordan (collectively “Defendants”) are charged in a seventeen-count Second Superseding Indictment relating to a series of armed Hobbs Act1 robberies committed in Baltimore City and Baltimore County, Maryland in January and February 2011. The Defendants filed numerous pre-trial motions, including a variety of motions to suppress. Over the course of five separate days, this Court heard argument and ruled on all but one of the motions to suppress. The only remaining pending motion is Defendant Graham’s Motion…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. LeonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Malley v. BriggsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AugustineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- State v. EarlsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
- Shawn Alvin Tracey v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
- United States v. EvansDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- United States v. Aaron GrahamCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.