Legal Opinion

Reddick v. Federal Deposit Insurance

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided January 8, 2016No. 2014-3188PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUGHES, Circuit Judge.

Timothy Reddick served in a term appointment with the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The FDIC offered to extend the term appointment, which Mr. Reddick accepted. Prior to the start of the extended portion of the term appointment, the FDIC revoked the already-accepted offer. The issue is whether the revocation constituted a “removal” under 5 U.S.C. § 7512. An arbitrator ruled in favor of the FDIC. We agree and dismiss the appeal. We hold that the extension offer was still revocable by the FDIC even after acceptance by Mr. Reddick. Therefore, the offer of extension…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. FaustoSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Lindahl v. Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Goutos v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
  4. George Dunbar Prewitt, Jr. v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  5. Betty J. Vukonich v. Civil Service Commission and the United States of America, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leslie Kerr v. Sally JewellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
  2. Ricci v. MSPBCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
  3. A. M. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API