Legal Opinion
Landmark Chemicals, SA. v. Merrill Lynch & Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 8, 2005No. 03Civ.2130RJHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
HOLWELL, District Judge.
Defendant/interpleader-plaintiff Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated (“Merrill Lynch”) seeks reimbursement for $67,708.30 in attorneys’ fees and $1,389.01 in costs for legal services rendered by Dorsey & Whitney LLP in connection with its counterclaim for interpleader. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Merrill Lynch attorneys’ fees in the amount of $51,000, and costs in the amount of $1,389.01.
I. BACKGROUND
On March 27, 2003, plaintiff Landmark Chemicals, S.A. (“Landmark”) initiated an action against Merrill…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Maria Difilippo and Raina Difilippo, by Her Mother and Next Friend Maria Difilippo, Cross-Appellees v. Tullio Morizio, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1985
- Septembertide Publishing, B.V. v. Stein And Day, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- A/s Krediit Pank v. The Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1962
- Algemene Bank Nederland, N v. v. Soysen Tarim Urunleri Dis Ticaret Ve Sanayi, A.S.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
- John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. DoranDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Underdog Trucking, L.L.C. v. Verizon Services Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Charles Schwab & Co. v. MakowskaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. BellDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020