Legal Opinion
City of Montclair v. Cohen
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided February 6, 2018No. C080430; C081817PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRaye, P.J.
*846*242The question of first impression presented by these consolidated appeals is whether housing authorities that assume the housing functions of their former redevelopment agencies, when a city or county purportedly elect not to, are eligible for the housing entity administrative cost allowance the city or county is not eligible to receive. ( Health & Saf. Code, § 34171.)1 The parties concede that the entities involved in these appeals are a reporting entity of the city or county, a component of the city or county, or are controlled by the city or county. (§ 34167.10.) In City of Montclair et…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Delaney v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- California Teachers Ass'n v. Governing Board of Rialto Unified School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Gay Law Students Ass'n v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1979
- Hassan v. Mercy American River HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- California Redevelopment Ass'n v. MatosantosCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olive v. Gen. Nutrition Ctrs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- City of Chula Vista v. StephenshawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2023
- City of Oakland v. Dept. of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
- Legal Aid Society of San Mateo v. Dept. of FinanceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Olive v. Gen. Nutrition Ctrs., Inc., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018