Legal Opinion

United States v. Felipe Madera-Gallegos, AKA Guadalupe Gallegos Carla Rosa Gallegos, AKA Clemencia Sandoval-Dominguez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 18, 1991No. 90-50108, 90-50127PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:

Felipe Madera-Gallegos (Felipe) and Carla Rosa Gallegos were convicted of conspiracy to possess heroin with intent to distribute in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. They appeal their sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines. Carla Rosa contends that the district court erred in applying the 2-level obstruction of justice enhancement and in not giving her the 4-level minimal participant reduction. Her ex-husband, Felipe, appeals only the obstruction of justice enhancement. We affirm in part; reverse and remand in part.

BACKGROUND

On November 23, 1988, an…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. Sanchez-LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Jose Jesus Lira-BarrazaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. William George HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. Andrew StroudCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Edward X. MondelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. CapersCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. United States v. Helene Donna Alpert, United States of America v. Carl Henry AlpertCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  3. United States v. Johnaton Sampson GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. United States v. Frederick R. Draves, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. George AnchetaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API