Legal Opinion · Dissent

In the Matter of Mark G. Legato (077464), In the Matter of Regan C. Kenyon, Jr. (077465), In the Matter of Alexander D. Walter (077467), Attorneys at Law

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 24, 2017No. D-99/100/101-15Published

1DissentJustice Albin

Some “ethical violations are, by their very nature, so patently offensive to the elementary standards of a lawyer’s professional duty that they per se warrant disbarment.” In re Cammarano, 219 N.J. 415, 421, 98 A.3d 1184 (2014) (quoting In re Conway, 107 N.J. 168, 180, 526 A.2d 658 (1987)). The sexual exploitation or abuse of children—whether completed or, as in the Legato and Kenyon matters, attempted—is such an egregious violation of societal norms that no discipline short of disbarment will ensure public confidence in the bar or the judiciary’s governance of the bar.

In recommending the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. In Re HughesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Matter of ConwaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  4. Matter of GreenbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1998
  5. In the Matter of Neil M. Cohen, an Attorney at LawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2014

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API