Legal Opinion

State v. Freiberg

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1967PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

Was there sufficient evidence to establish the wilfulness of defendants failure to support?

The burden of proof in a nonsupport case is the same as in any criminal matter — proof of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. This court recently said in Gauthier v. State (1965), 28 Wis. (2d) 412, 415, 187 N. W. (2d) 101, that:

“The burden of proof upon the state is the same whether the case is tried before a jury or before a court. That burden is to prove the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The test applied upon appeal to this court is whether the ‘evidence adduced, believed and rationally…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Zitlow v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Brandel v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Stumpf & Langhoff, Ltd. v. Espenhain Dry Goods Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Thoreson v. Milwaukee & Suburban Transport Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. CissellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Roberts v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. State v. JorgensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API