Legal Opinion
Stein Fur Dyeing Co. v. Windsor Fur Dyeing Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 4, 1929No. 3315PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
This is an action in equity based on the alleged infringement of patent No. 1,564,378, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for “Improvement in Bleached and Dyed Furs and the Like,” dated December 8, 1925; and patent No. 1,573,200, issued to Hyman Stein, William E. Austin, and Irving Liebowitz, for “Process for Bleaching and Dyeing Furs and the Like,” dated February 16,1926; both of which patents have been assigned to and are owned by the plaintiff.
Mr. William E. Austin, one of the inventors and secretary of the plaintiff, has had a wide…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Corona Cord Tire Co. v. Dovan Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Clark Thread Co. v. Willimantic Linen Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Powder Co. v. Powder WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. RadinskySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. J. Meyerson, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1931
- Steinfur Patents Corp. v. Iceland Fur Dyeing Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1930