Legal Opinion
Anderson v. Roberts
District Court, C.D. California
Decided December 1, 1986No. CV 84-9206-AHS(G)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STOTLER, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order No. 194, attached is the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate who has reviewed the complaint filed herein.
The Court has reviewed the complaint, the file, and the attached Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Ralph J. Geffen, and concurs with and adopts the findings and conclusions stated therein. No objections have been made by the parties.
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff shall not recover against defendant Stewart, and the action is dismissed as to said defendant; and
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Josephina Duchesne as Administratrix of the Estate of Pauline Perez v. Jule M. SugarmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Thomas C. Lossman v. Mary H. PekarskeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Peralta v. Custom Image Pros LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2023