Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hackett v. Maine Central Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 28, 1946Published

1Dissent

Chapman, A. R. J.,

dissenting.

As to the conclusion of the three justices writing and concurring in the above opinion that the jury erred in the finding as to the damages, I am in agreement. The plaintiff, after the accident, went to his place of employment and lost no time therefrom on that day or thereafter. He made one visit to his personal physician and had three osteopathic treatments. His medical bills were $20.50. By stipulation, the damage to his automobile was $1,000. The jury’s award of damages was $3,108.40. Therefore, $2,108.40 was for his personal injuries inclusive of medical…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  2. Smith v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1895
  3. Witherly v. Bangor & Aroostook RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  4. The Fin MacCoolCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1906
  5. Hooper v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1889

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API