Legal Opinion
(PC) Polk v. Godina
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 22, 2019No. 1:12-cv-01094Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SUSAN MAE POLK, Case No. 1:12-cv-01094-LJO-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT 13 v. PURSUANT TO FRCP 60(b)(5) AND (6) 14 GODINA, et al., (ECF No. 69) 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 19 pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On November 16, 2015, judgment was entered dismissing this action with prejudice for 21 failure to state a claim. (ECF…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- R.E. Rodgers and Barbara Rodgers v. James G. Watt, Secretary of the Interior of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Kern-Tulare Water District v. City of BakersfieldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Wichita Visible Gasoline Pump Co. v. Clear Vision Pump Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Knick v. Township of ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 2019