Legal Opinion

Espinoza v. Cargill Meat Solutions Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided October 5, 2010No. 09-11170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRADO, Circuit Judge:

Tina Espinoza appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation (“Cargill”) on her negligence and gross negligence claims, stemming from an injury she incurred while working at Cargill’s meat packing plant. The district court found that (1) Espinoza waived her right to sue Cargill under Texas tort law by electing to participate in the Cargill Meat Solutions Corporation Texas Occupational Temporary Disability Plan (the “Plan”); (2) § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), preempted her…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Alex Sheshunoff Management Services, L.P. v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Matthews v. Chicago Transit AuthorityIllinois Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Cole v. Knowledge Learning Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
  3. McKnight v. Dresser, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
  4. Trustmark Nat'l Bank v. Tegeler (In re Tegeler)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2018
  5. QT Trading, L.P. v. M/V Saga MorusCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API