Legal Opinion

City of Kent v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 11, 2011No. 64672-9-IPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpearman, J.

¶1 — The city of Kent (City) asks this court to reverse the superior court’s ruling that Kent City Code (KCC) 9.39.030, which provides for fixed, mandatory periods of impoundment when the driver of a car is arrested for an enumerated offense, exceeds the City’s authority under *128chapter 46.55 RCW. The undisputed facts establish that a Kent police officer had Raymond Mann’s car impounded for 30 days under KCC 9.39.030 because Mann was driving with a suspended license. Mann had a vehicle impound hearing in Kent Municipal Court, which ruled that KCC 9.39.030 exceeded the City’s authority under…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Estate of Haselwood v. Bremerton Ice Arena, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. City of Olympia v. DrebickWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  4. All Around Underground, Inc. v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Impoundment of Chevrolet TruckWashington Supreme Court · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. City of Kent v. MannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API