Legal Opinion

City of Kent v. Mann

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 11, 2011No. 64672-9-IPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

253 P.3d 409 (2011)

161 Wash.App. 126

CITY OF KENT, Petitioner,

v.

Raymond MANN, Respondent.

No. 64672-9-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

April 11, 2011.

Julie Marie Stormes, City of Kent Law Dept., Kent, WA, for Appellant.

David Richard Kirshenbaum, Att. at Law, Kent, WA, for Respondent.

SPEARMAN, J.

¶ 1 The City of Kent asks this court to reverse the superior court's ruling that Kent City Code (KCC) 9.39.030, which provides for fixed, mandatory periods of impoundment when the driver of a car is arrested for an enumerated offense, exceeds the City's authority under chapter 46.55 RCW. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. All Around Underground, Inc. v. Washington State PatrolWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  2. In Re Impoundment of Chevrolet TruckWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Columbia Physical Therapy, Inc. v. Benton Franklin Orthopedic Associates, PLLCWashington Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Becerra v. City of WardenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  5. City of Kent v. MannCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Henry Grisby Iii, Resp. v. Robert Herzog, Apps.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API