Legal Opinion

Manry v. Stephens

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 11, 1940No. 13178PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Justice.

1. That a judgment or decree does not follow or is not authorized by the verdict, or is not warranted by the pleadings, is not good ground of a motion for new trial. Brannan v. McWilliams, 146 Ga. 528 (91 S. E. 772); Potts v. Atlanta, 140 Ga. 431 (79 S. E. 110); Eubanks v. West, 119 Ga. 804 (47 S. E. 194); Berry v. Clark, 117 Ga. 964 (44 S. E. 824); Collins v. Carr, 118 Ga. 205 (44 S. E. 1000). But that the verdict does not cover or is contrary to the issues made by the pleadings is a question which may be raised by a motion for new trial. Tompkins v. Corry, 14 Ga. 118 (2),…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Sumner v. SumnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. Berry v. ClarkSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Leathers v. LeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  4. Tompkins v. CorrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1853
  5. Brannan v. McWilliamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Pittman v. PittmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Allen v. WithrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Hubbard v. WhatleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
  4. Crenshaw v. CrenshawSupreme Court of Georgia · 1944
  5. Gray v. Junction City Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API