County of Hennepin v. Brotherhood of the Church of Gethsemane
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant, upon application being made to the district court for Hennepin county for judgment for taxes of 1878 against lots 8 and 9, described in the opinion, and of which it was the owner, appeared and filed its answer objecting to the same. The court, Young, J., presiding, having made findings of fact and law, ordered judgment for defendant. Thereupon, on motion of plaintiff, the proceedings were certified to this court under Gen’. St. 1878, c. 11, § 80.
1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.
The facts found by the district court are these: The defendant is, and for several years last past has been, a corporation under the laws of this state, and, as such, owner of lots 8 and in block 212, in Nelson’s addition to Minne*461apolis. Defendant is also owner of lot 10, in the same block, tipon which is situated a building in which defendant has, for several years last past, maintained a hospital for the care of such as need the benefits of such an institution. This is known as the Cottage Hospital, and the public generally are entitled to enjoy its benefits, without regard to sex, race, or…
2Cited by45 opinions
- Cedars of Lebanon Hospital v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Santa Rosa Infirmary v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Boys' Club of Clifton, Inc. v. Township of JeffersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Hibernian Benevolent Society v. KellyOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Fitterer v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.