Legal Opinion

Wright v. Miller

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 14, 1998No. 37486-9-IPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973’s (RLTA) proscription of lease provisions obligating a tenant to pay the landlord’s attorney fees does not prohibit a lease provision providing attorney fees to the prevailing party in a dispute arising out of the agreement. The evil that the RLTA’s proscription was designed to prevent, fee shifting to a party with little or no bargaining power, irrespective of the merits of a dispute, is not present in the context of prevailing party provisions. A subsequently enacted statute, RCW 4.84.330, specifically provides reasonable attorney fees and costs…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Haywood v. ArandaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Haywood v. ArandaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Newton v. LegarskyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API