Wright v. Miller
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
The Residential Landlord-Tenant Act of 1973’s (RLTA) proscription of lease provisions obligating a tenant to pay the landlord’s attorney fees does not prohibit a lease provision providing attorney fees to the prevailing party in a dispute arising out of the agreement. The evil that the RLTA’s proscription was designed to prevent, fee shifting to a party with little or no bargaining power, irrespective of the merits of a dispute, is not present in the context of prevailing party provisions. A subsequently enacted statute, RCW 4.84.330, specifically provides reasonable attorney fees and costs…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Stiley v. BlockWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- Mason v. Mortgage America, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1990
- Nevers v. Fireside, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. WakefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1996
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Lian v. StalickCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Haywood v. ArandaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Haywood v. ArandaWashington Supreme Court · 2001
- Newton v. LegarskyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.