Legal Opinion

New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Luddeke

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 9, 1934No. 9331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

This is a workmen's compensation case, in which Fred f. Luddeke was the employee, H. J. Von Rosenberg the employer, and New Amsterdam Casualty Company the insurer. The latter has appealed from a judgment awarding lump sum compensation to the employee.

Appellee devotes the first eighteen pages of his brief to objections to the consideration of the assignments of error and propositions propounded in appellant's brief. Many of those objections are well taken and will be given effect, but need not be discussed at this juncture.

In its first proposition appellant complains of two rulings of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Everett & LongCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Neal v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Bertram v. Reed Automobile Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Jones v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  5. Hardin v. PalmCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cummings v. OrmsbyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API