Baldwin v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HOLSTEIN, Judge.
At issue in this consolidated driver’s license suspension case is an asserted ambiguity resulting from 1996 amendments to secs. 302.505 to 302.545, RSMo Cum.Supp. (1996).1 Folio-wing the suspension of their licenses, appellants filed petitions for de novo review in circuit court. Each circuit court rendered a decision in favor of the director. Due to the similarity of the issues of law presented, the cases have been consolidated. The facts are not in dispute in either case. The circuit court’s judgment is reversed as to appellant Bradley Baldwin. The judgment of the circuit…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Spradlin v. City of FultonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Cox v. Tyson Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1996
- Hagan v. Director of RevenueSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- EBG Health Care III, Inc. v. Missouri Health Facilities Review CommitteeMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Ford v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Smith v. City of St. LouisMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Viacom, Inc. v. Transit Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2004
- Crawford v. Division of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- Jones v. Jackson County Circuit CourtMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.