Legal Opinion
Robbins v. Ring
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 17, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtOwen McGivekn, J.
The defendant, Gridoil Freehold Leases Ltd., a Canadian corporation appearing specially by attorney for the purpose of this motion, moves pursuant to section 237-a of the Civil Practice Act, for an order setting aside the service of a summons on the ground that Gridoil is a foreign corporation and not subject to the jurisdiction of the State of New York. •
From the papers, it appears that Gridoil has not filed a certificate of doing business in New York and that its main *45activity lies in the production of oil, and the manufacture of gas in Canada, these activities being based on tracts of land…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- Elish v. St. Louis Southwestern RailwayNew York Court of Appeals · 1953
- Gertsenstein v. Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Co.City of New York Municipal Court · 1952
3Cited by6 opinions
- Lurie v. RupeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
- Gilson v. Pittsburgh Forgings CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Deer Consumer Products, Inc. v. LittleNew York Supreme Court · 2012
- Appaloosa Investment, L.P.I. v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Appaloosa Inv., LPI v. JP MORGAN SEC., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.