Legal Opinion

Appaloosa Investment, L.P.I. v. J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc.

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided January 28, 2008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

COBURN, P.J.A.D.

Defendant Barriek Gold Corporation moved for dismissal of plaintiffs’ complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction. The trial court denied the motion, and we granted Barriek leave to appeal. Barriek is located in Canada and its stock is traded on the Toronto stock exchange in Canada and on the New York Stock Exchange. As of the filing of the complaint, its only continuous conduct in New Jersey was the use of a New Jersey company to act as a transfer agent in relation to its publicly traded stock and the use of other New Jersey companies…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wiwa v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Harlow v. Children's HospitalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2005
  3. Lebel v. Everglades Marina, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Celi v. Canadian Occidental Petroleum Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1992
  5. Fowble v. Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Appaloosa Inv., LPI v. JP MORGAN SEC., INC.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API