Legal Opinion

Matusik v. Dorn

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 24, 1988No. 2 CA-CV 88-0114PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

BACKGROUND AND FACTS

This is an appeal from the granting of a summary judgment. The issue here is whether the “discovery rule” applies to a breach of contract action against the builder of improvements to real estate. The facts, considered in the light most favorable to the appellants, show that on March 3, 1977, the appellants purchased a home built by appellee Michael Dorn, a general contractor. On or about October 10, 1982, Arizona Public Service Company entered the premises and “red tagged” all gas appliances and all gas lines leading into the house because…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Poffenberger v. RisserCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  2. Kenyon v. HammerArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Ehrenhaft v. Malcolm Price, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Woodward v. Chirco Const. Co., Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Anson v. American Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  2. 1000 Virginia Ltd. Partnership v. Vertecs Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gust, Rosenfeld & Henderson v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Bauman v. DayAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Scott v. SAVERS PROPERTY AND CAS. INS. CO.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API